Search for: "Johnson v. Georgia-Pacific" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2017, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Johnson's guilty plea stemmed from his installation of malicious code on Georgia-Pacific's information technology system after G-P terminated his employment. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am by Florian Mueller
I believe Georgia-Pacific doesn't work well for FRAND royalties because simulating a negotiation between two parties would allow patentees to capture post-standardization hold-up value. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law,… [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am by Marissa Miller
At the National Review Online, John Gordon discusses Georgia-Pacific West v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am by Kelly
Tyco Healthcare Group (IPBiz) (Patently-O) (GRAY on Claims) CAFC: prosecution history estoppel: Marctec v Johnson & Johnson and Cordis Corporation (IPBiz) CAFC: Divorce and patents: Enovsys v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 11:30 am
Lorena Weeks of Georgia used Title VII to get promoted from telephone operator to switchman at Southern Bell, while Leah Rosenfeld of California used it to ascend to a job as a station agent with the Southern Pacific Railroad. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Bard, Inc., 311 F.3d 1272, 1287 (11th Cir. 2002) (applying Georgia law); Fane v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am by Kelly
Johnson & Johnson (Kluwer) EWHC (Pat) finds no infringement of coronary stent patents: Abbott Laboratories Limited v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
(Afro-IP) Poland Poland: the battle over OXFORD (Class 46) Scotland Damages for damaging a brand: Tullis Russell v Inveresk (IP finance) South Africa SAIIPL’s new pres, transhipment and Afro-IP stats (Afro-IP) Johnson & Johnson application dismissed in counterfeit goods case (Afro-IP) Taiwan Trademark priority rights and the Taiwan question (China Hearsay) United Kingdom Belgian SCAM brings cash to British journos (1709 Blog) The PCC Page, no.6: Judge injects… [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Georgia Pacific Consumer Products, LP 13-41Issue: Whether the court of appeals erred in refusing to follow the holdings of the Eighth and Sixth Circuits involving identical trademark litigation and not giving those rulings preclusive effect – and doing so in ways that disregard the district courts’ inherent authority to consider preclusion and do serious violence to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 and the proper standards other circuits routinely follow when… [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 7:01 am by Sara Bjerg Moller
Unlike Chapter VI (“Pacific Settlement of Disputes”), which is typically associated with U.N. peace operations, Chapter VII is often known as the “peace enforcement” chapter. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
" Petito, 750 So.2d at 106-07.GeorgiaThe law in Georgia is limited to a federal court's prediction that Georgia law would not allow independent medical monitoring claims. [read post]